梁山·价值投资笔记

昨晚看前辈Ramond Chen的部落格，里面教诲大家发伊妹儿问问题的时候最好把你踹过的东西都讲讲，免得浪费DL上别人的时间。里面有个回帖很有意思，文中提到：

I seem to have the exactly opposite problem.

I write a question for a discussion group. I re-read it and think, nah, this question will make the reader think I’m struggling with the widely known issue ABC. So I add: Please note it’s not the issue ABC because conditions X and Y are not met in my case.

OK, I re-read the whole thing again and add yet another clarification: Also note that XYZ solution does not apply here because of GHI.

The process repeats several times. Finally I’m happy with the result so I post the question.

Very quickly I get a response — You’re a n00b, it’s a widely known issue ABC! RTFM!

I respond — please read my question again. I described why ABC does not apply here.

I then get another answer (often from the same person): Try XYZ then.

Again, I reply — please read my question again. I described why XYZ won’t help me.

Several posts later we finally achieve a point where everybody has finally read my question in full and actually understood it. But at that point they are so pissed off for being told to read my question again several times that they are not willing to help anymore.

哈哈，倾框倒箧（竹筒倒豆）的人士和挤牙膏风格的人士碰到一起还是蛮有趣的。

http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2010/04/22/10000406.aspx